The current study show no significant relationships between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller mais aussi al

The current study show no significant relationships between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller mais aussi al

Participants

There were 437 (270 ladies) people, have been hired thru in public places obtainable networks. The indicate many years is 23 age (SD = 5.96). Users was requested accomplish some surveys a few of that are not related toward current data. Every victims provided their advised agree into discharge of their try ratings getting lookup aim, and all sorts of have been given opinions towards standard consequence of the study. The newest dataset analysed within the latest https://datingranking.net/happn-review studies can be found in the

Steps

Insecure narcissism is mentioned with the Hypersensitive Narcissism Level by the Hendin and you may Cheek (1997) regarding the Polish translation (get a hold of Czarna mais aussi al. 2014). They consists of 10 situations with an excellent Likert-such as reaction scale from one (highly disagree) so you’re able to 5 (highly concur).

Grandiose narcissism are reviewed to your verified Polish adaptation (Bazinska and you may Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of one’s Narcissistic Character Inventory (Raskin and you will Hallway 1979). What exactly was in fact picked basing toward basis data (loadings exceeding .40) and portrayed another subscales of the NPI: Authority (eleven things), Self-Sufficiency (7), Vanity (5), and you can Exhibitionism (11). Participants rated their degree of approval of every report using a beneficial Likert-method of effect format, from one (does not apply at myself) to help you 5 (relates to myself). The sum of things produces an inventory away from grandiose narcissism. It has been found has just the Likert format NPI manifests equivalent make legitimacy and you may slightly enhanced precision into new pushed-options format (Miller ainsi que al. 2018a).

The big Five is actually reviewed which have Gloss variation (Strus ainsi que al. 2014) of one’s Around the world Identity Items Pool – Large Five Factor Measure (BFAS; DeYoung ainsi que al. 2007). This can be a 100-items measure of trait domain names (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you will Openness/Intellect) and also the a few all the way down-order regions of for every domain (Volatility, Detachment, Compassion, Courtesy, Industriousness, Orderliness, Love, Assertiveness, Intellect, and you can Visibility). Participants is questioned to help you rate simply how much brand new statements is actually associated on it into the good Likert-types of level, from 1 (firmly disagree) to 5 (highly consent).

Efficiency

First, i checked-out the correlations anywhere between several variations out-of narcissism and identity attributes together with domains and facets (Table 1). Both particular narcissism correlated that have character traits when you look at the a similar treatment for previous research (age.grams. Miller ainsi que al. 2011). Especially, insecure narcissism try undoubtedly coordinated that have Neuroticism, and you may negatively associated with the Agreeableness and you can Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism correlated surely with Extraversion, Openness/Intelligence and you may Conscientiousness, and you can adversely that have Neuroticism and you can Agreeableness.

Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).

Geef een antwoord

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd.